Why fields, not particles
What goes wrong if I insist on a wavefunction for one relativistic particle?
David Tong · The Royal Institution
Frontier · Module 16
The deepest layer of established physics: reconcile quantum mechanics with special relativity and particles stop being fundamental. Fields are, and particles are what excitations of fields look like to a detector.
By the end of this module
You can explain what a particle is in the theory that replaced particles.
What goes wrong if I insist on a wavefunction for one relativistic particle?
David Tong · The Royal Institution
How do I quantize something with infinitely many degrees of freedom?
David Tong, Cambridge
Widely regarded as the best free QFT notes in existence.
What did Dirac do to the wave equation to make it relativistic?
Paul Dirac, 1928
Spin and antimatter arrive uninvited.
Why do the infinities cancel, and is that legitimate?
Richard Feynman, University of Auckland
Feynman explaining QED to a general audience with no mathematics. Free video archive.
Can I reformulate all of quantum mechanics as a sum over histories?
Richard Feynman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 1948
Check yourself
Every answer comes with the reasoning, not just a verdict. Getting one wrong and reading why is the point.
01In quantum field theory, a particle is:
02Renormalization is best understood as:
03Antimatter appears in Dirac's theory because: